AI Security Testing
Assess LLM and agentic application risks, including prompt injection, data exposure, tool permissions, retrieval boundaries and output handling.
Alignment: OWASP LLM and Agentic AI guidance, ISO/IEC 27090 and MITRE ATLAS.
Discuss your needs
From AI applications and agents to web applications, APIs, operational technology and source code.
Assess LLM and agentic application risks, including prompt injection, data exposure, tool permissions, retrieval boundaries and output handling.
Alignment: OWASP LLM and Agentic AI guidance, ISO/IEC 27090 and MITRE ATLAS.
Internal and external web application testing across the agreed attack surface, access roles and business workflows.
Assess authentication, authorisation, data exposure and business-logic risks in the APIs in scope.
Assess operational technology environments using an agreed, safety-aware approach that respects operational constraints and testing windows.
Review implementation risks, sensitive-data handling and security controls in the code under assessment.
Discuss other systems and specialist assessment needs to define a suitable testing scope.
We select applicable references, test cases and reporting mappings for each authorised engagement.
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 · OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 · ISO/IEC 27090:2026 · MITRE ATLAS
OWASP Web Security Testing Guide · OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) · OWASP Top 10:2025
OWASP API Security Top 10 · OWASP Web Security Testing Guide · OWASP ASVS
NIST SP 800-82 Rev. 3 · MITRE ATT&CK for ICS
OWASP Code Review Guide · OWASP ASVS · OWASP Top 10:2025
Testing coverage depends on the agreed systems, access, methods and applicable reference versions. Use of a framework does not imply certification or endorsement.
Authorise & scope → Test → Report findings → Support remediation → Retest as agreed
Agree the targets, methods, evidence handling, operational constraints and reporting requirements before testing. Findings should include evidence, impact and practical remediation priorities.
Framework alignment guides the testing approach; it does not imply endorsement or certification by OWASP, ISO or MITRE. Coverage and retesting are defined in the engagement scope.