Discuss your needs
← All services
Security Testing

Find weaknesses.
Make remediation actionable.

From AI applications and agents to web applications, APIs, operational technology and source code.

AI Security Testing

Assess LLM and agentic application risks, including prompt injection, data exposure, tool permissions, retrieval boundaries and output handling.

Alignment: OWASP LLM and Agentic AI guidance, ISO/IEC 27090 and MITRE ATLAS.

Web application pentesting

Internal and external web application testing across the agreed attack surface, access roles and business workflows.

API security testing

Assess authentication, authorisation, data exposure and business-logic risks in the APIs in scope.

OT security testing

Assess operational technology environments using an agreed, safety-aware approach that respects operational constraints and testing windows.

Source code reviews

Review implementation risks, sensitive-data handling and security controls in the code under assessment.

Additional testing

Discuss other systems and specialist assessment needs to define a suitable testing scope.

METHODOLOGY / TECHNICAL COVERAGE

Standards and guidance behind our testing

We select applicable references, test cases and reporting mappings for each authorised engagement.

AI security testing →

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2026 · OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026 · ISO/IEC 27090:2026 · MITRE ATLAS

Web application testing →

OWASP Web Security Testing Guide · OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) · OWASP Top 10:2025

Testing coverage depends on the agreed systems, access, methods and applicable reference versions. Use of a framework does not imply certification or endorsement.

A clear testing engagement.

Authorise & scope → Test → Report findings → Support remediation → Retest as agreed

Scope a security test →

Agree the targets, methods, evidence handling, operational constraints and reporting requirements before testing. Findings should include evidence, impact and practical remediation priorities.

Framework alignment guides the testing approach; it does not imply endorsement or certification by OWASP, ISO or MITRE. Coverage and retesting are defined in the engagement scope.

Methodology references